• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Roebourne Bank Murders

Roebourne Bank Murders

The 1885 murders of William Anketell and Henry Burrup at the Union Bank Roebourne and the ensuing investigation and controversy.

  • Home
  • Summary of Events
  • Witness accounts of murder scene
    • by F.C. Broadhurst
    • by W.M. Thomas
  • Police File
  • Depositions
  • The murder trial
  • Newspaper Articles
    • The West Australian
    • The Fremantle Herald
    • The Argus
    • The Enquirer
    • The Eastern Districts Chronicle
  • Motive and musings
    • Prejudice and rumours
    • The Motive
    • The psychology behind the murders
    • My Musings
    • Who did it?
  • Roebourne in 1885
  • Roebourne maps and photos
    • Western Australia
    • 1885 Roebourne Town Map
    • Early Maps of Roebourne Townsite
    • Roebourne and Surrounding Country
    • Early photos of Roebourne
  • Biographies
    • Thomas Anketell
    • Henry Thomas Wood Burrup
    • Frederick Bevan
    • Charles Warburton
    • James Lithgow
    • The Pontt Brothers – William and Augustus
    • Caroline Platt
  • Memoir Extracts
  • Can you help with these names?
  • Bibliography
  • Acknowledgements

Motive – The psychology behind the murders

The psychology behind the murders

I do have to wonder what great psychological factors were at work during the brutal murders of Thomas Anketell and Henry Burrup. I am not a psychologist, but I thought I would attempt to write briefly about this as it is an important aspect of the case that I believe holds the key as to why both men were murdered.

The nature of the murders was particularly brutal. Thomas was struck on the head many times with an instrument that was likely a pick axe. Any one of those blows would have been fatal. With so many blows such a murder is known as “overkill”. Overkill indicates that the murderer was in a rage. I suggest a deep rage because the murderer even turned the axe so that he could bring the spike down through Thomas’s ear. It was as if Thomas was being obliterated. The rage did not subside after the physical effort of the first murder it was maintained for a second murder, the victim being in a different part of the building. I think it likely Thomas was murdered first as he was sleeping out on the verandah. Henry was then murdered in a similarly brutal manner and yet a pillow was placed over his head after the deed by the murderer. Could the rage have, by this time, burnt out and the murderer showing some form of regret?

This leads me to wonder what emotion drove the rage and what was the cause of such an emotion?

There is a very interesting paper titled “Shame: The_root_of_violence” by Professor Chris Poulson. In it he states:

“Violence is symbolic of disrupted relationships, of something gone wrong. Violence is also symbolic of power as it asserted over the target of the violence. Violence is used to express emotion; violence is used to control.”

and

“The central argument of this paper is that shame, most especially accumulated shame that has not had an avenue for effective discharge, is the root of violence.”

Was “shame” the driver for the violent Roebourne Bank Murders? It’s an interesting question to ponder. Perhaps one day I may be able to get an expert opinion from someone who is far more qualified and knowledgeable in this field than myself.

Primary Sidebar


This website was selected for preservation by the State Library of Western Australia. It is now listed in perpetuity on PANDORA, Australia’s website archive established by the National Library of Australia.

Copyright © 2023 · Fran Yeoh. All rights reserved.